首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficacy of indapamide SR compared with enalapril in elderly hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.
【2h】

Efficacy of indapamide SR compared with enalapril in elderly hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.

机译:吲达帕胺SR与依那普利在2型糖尿病老年高血压患者中的疗效比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure control is the main influential variable in reducing microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this subanalysis of the Natrilix SR versus Enalapril Study in hypertensive Type 2 diabetics with micrOalbuminuRia (NESTOR) study, we have compared the effectiveness of indapamide sustained release (SR) and enalapril in reducing blood pressure and microalbuminuria in patients > or =65 years of age. METHODS: Of the 570 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent microalbuminuria in the NESTOR study, 187 (33%) individuals > or =65 years of age were included in this analysis. Of these, 95 patients received indapamide SR 1.5 mg and 92 patients received enalapril 10 mg, taken once daily in both cases. Adjunctive amlodipine and/or atenolol was added if required. RESULTS: The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio decreased by 46% in the indapamide SR group and 47% in the enalapril group. Noninferiority of indapamide SR over enalapril was demonstrated (P = .0236; 35% limit of noninferiority) with a ratio of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.34). Mean arterial pressure decreased by 18 mm Hg and 15 mm Hg in the indapamide SR and the enalapril groups, respectively (P = .1136). The effects of both treatments seen in these elderly patients were similar to those observed in the main population, although the extent of the reduction in microalbuminuria was slightly higher. Both treatments were well tolerated, and no difference between groups was observed regarding glucose or lipid profiles. CONCLUSION: Indapamide SR is not less effective than enalapril in reducing microalbuminuria and blood pressure in patients aged >65 years of age with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.
机译:背景:血压控制是减少2型糖尿病患者微量白蛋白尿的主要影响因素。在本次Natrilix SR与依那普利研究与2型糖尿病高血压患者的微分析中,我们比较了吲达帕胺持续释放(SR)和依那普利在≥65岁的患者中降低血压和微量白蛋白尿的有效性。年龄。方法:在NESTOR研究中,在570名2型糖尿病和持续性微量白蛋白尿高血压患者中,有187名(33%)>或= 65岁的患者参加了该分析。其中,95例患者服用吲达帕胺SR 1.5毫克,92例患者服用依那普利10毫克,在两种情况下均每天服用一次。如果需要,加入辅助氨氯地平和/或阿替洛尔。结果:吲达帕胺SR组尿白蛋白/肌酐比值降低了46%,依那普利组降低了47%。证实吲达帕胺SR与依那普利相比具有非劣效性(P = .0236;非劣效性极限为35%),比率为0.95(95%CI:0.68,1.34)。吲达帕胺SR组和依那普利组的平均动脉压分别降低18 mm Hg和15 mm Hg(P = .1136)。在这些老年患者中,两种治疗的效果与主要人群中观察到的效果相似,尽管微量白蛋白尿减少的程度略高。两种治疗均耐受良好,并且在血糖或脂质分布方面未观察到组间差异。结论:吲达帕胺SR在降低65岁以上2型糖尿病和高血压患者的微量白蛋白尿和血压方面不比依那普利有效。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号